Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Debbie Lerman's avatar

Love all the work and research you continue to do!!!!

Expand full comment
Bob Stone's avatar

April/May 2020 alligns with the globally coordinated campaign of bureaucratic mass senicide needed to make a severe seasonal influenza look like a lethal pandemic.

I think that’s your “ghost bomb”

LOCKING DOWN” AN ENTIRE STATE TO “PROTECT THE VULNERABLE ELDERLY POPULATION” FROM COVID WHILE SIMULTANEOUSLY MANDATING COVID PATIENTS INTO NURSING HOMES WITHOUT COMMITTING DEPRAVED INDIFFERENCE MURDER IS LOGICALLY IMPOSSIBLE.

A person is guilty of Depraved Indifference Murder when, under circumstances evincing a depraved indifference to human life, he recklessly engages in conduct which creates a grave and unjustifiable risk of death to another person, knowingly disregards such risk, and thereby causes the death of that person.

“Depraved indifference to human life” means a wicked, evil, or inhuman state of mind, as manifested by brutal, heinous, and despicable acts. We’re talking about conduct that is so

devoid of regard for the life or lives of others that it’s just as malicious and criminal as the person who intentionally kills.

The phrase “recklessly engages in conduct which creates a grave and unjustifiable risk of death to another person” means:

• Engaging in conduct which creates a grave and unjustifiable risk that another person’s death will occur,

• AND consciously disregarding that risk in a way that constitutes a gross deviation from the standard of conduct that a reasonable person would observe in the situation.

No reasonable person, or State, would ever take two completely contradictory courses of action within a life or death situation while claiming both were simultaneously intended to save lives. The truth of one necessitates the falsity of the other.

More particularly: The safety of one course of action necessitates the lethality of the other.

Thus, no reasonable person or State would lockdown the entire healthy population for the alleged purpose of keeping the COVID virus as far from the vulnerable elderly as possible while simultaneously creating a grave and unjustifiable risk of their deaths by mandating COVID patients into nursing homes.

If one truly believed “the necessary precautions”—i.e., the CMS and CDC “transmission based precautions”—would keep the elderly safe enough to justify the nursing home mandate, then the lockdown was never necessary and all deaths resulting therefrom were Depraved Indifference Murder.

Likewise, if one truly believed the “novel” virus was so lethal and difficult to contain as to warrant locking down the entire healthy population for the ostensible purpose of protecting the elderly from COVID, then mandating COVID patients into nursing homes during the lockdown was Depraved Indifference Murder.

Thus, because mandating COVID patients into nursing homes during the lockdown violates the law of noncontradiction, it is DEDUCTIVE—sans counterfactual premises—PROOF of Depraved Indifference Murder.

Incredible as it may sound, there is no triable issue of fact because any conceivable defense is a logical impossibility—making both the lockdown and the nursing home mandate acts of malice necessarily.

Therefore, every death resulting from the nursing home mandate and the statewide lockdown—while both were simultaneously in effect—was Depraved Indifference Murder.

P.S. It took me five months to see the foregoing glaringly obvious proof of murder after finding proof of Andrew Cuomo’s intent to kill the nursing home residents within Executive Order 202.5–issued one week prior to the nursing home mandate of March 25, 2020

N.B. The states of New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Michigan all mandated COVID patients into nursing homes during their respective lockdowns.

At the same time, “the cartel” was murdering the elderly in England with midazolam.

Expand full comment
22 more comments...

No posts