As the comment by Allen (on Suavek post) says just before the excerpt you cite here:
“The authoritative virologists of the Chinese disease authority published their results on 1/24/20 and 2/3/20. They reported the isolation of ‘many’ short gene sequences, which, when strung together, could represent a genetic strand of a new type of virus.
“The authors explicitly pointed out (as well as many other virologists involved to date) that the absolutely necessary experiments have not yet been carried out which would make it possible to claim that this is indeed a genetic strand of a ‘pathogenic virus.’”
In other words, the PCR tests were based on ‘in silico’ compilations of “short gene sequences, which, when strung together, could represent a genetic strand of a new type of virus” -- computerized guesses based on software modeling designed to fabricate coronavirus genomes, or parts thereof.
The material on which the PCR test(s) is based wasn’t isolated as an intact, complete microorganism derived from a patient sample. The test refers to a composite of scrambled DNA, hypothetically assembled by a digital algorithm that selects for fragments that might be consistent with previously defined coronavirus genes.
With no connection to an empirically observed, full specific virus, the PCR test can therefore “identify” whatever you want it to, in anyone (especially with higher cycle thresholds).
Sadly, csofand, the truth tellers like you are NOW the main targets! So sad to read about MORE victims (especially the kids!) of Fauci's Ouchies! 😥 MeWe has now "engineered" me off of their site. Happy and Blessed Passover! 🕎
Are you familiar with crazy JJ Couey? This remainsl one of the best videos I've seen on the subject of PCR. He starts talking around the 18 minute mark. He's crazy, but interesting. One must have patience. Regards,
Oh, ... and if it is you, Substack ... that is manipulating who gets to see my work, trying to demoralize me, showing me little evidence of interest ... then GO LOVE YOURSELF!
As the comment by Allen (on Suavek post) says just before the excerpt you cite here:
“The authoritative virologists of the Chinese disease authority published their results on 1/24/20 and 2/3/20. They reported the isolation of ‘many’ short gene sequences, which, when strung together, could represent a genetic strand of a new type of virus.
“The authors explicitly pointed out (as well as many other virologists involved to date) that the absolutely necessary experiments have not yet been carried out which would make it possible to claim that this is indeed a genetic strand of a ‘pathogenic virus.’”
In other words, the PCR tests were based on ‘in silico’ compilations of “short gene sequences, which, when strung together, could represent a genetic strand of a new type of virus” -- computerized guesses based on software modeling designed to fabricate coronavirus genomes, or parts thereof.
The material on which the PCR test(s) is based wasn’t isolated as an intact, complete microorganism derived from a patient sample. The test refers to a composite of scrambled DNA, hypothetically assembled by a digital algorithm that selects for fragments that might be consistent with previously defined coronavirus genes.
With no connection to an empirically observed, full specific virus, the PCR test can therefore “identify” whatever you want it to, in anyone (especially with higher cycle thresholds).
Thanks David. That is a good summation.
I think they manipulated the tests to achieve the outcome.
I appreciate your input, as always.
Sadly, csofand, the truth tellers like you are NOW the main targets! So sad to read about MORE victims (especially the kids!) of Fauci's Ouchies! 😥 MeWe has now "engineered" me off of their site. Happy and Blessed Passover! 🕎
Your long title sentence says it all...
Are you familiar with crazy JJ Couey? This remainsl one of the best videos I've seen on the subject of PCR. He starts talking around the 18 minute mark. He's crazy, but interesting. One must have patience. Regards,
https://stream.gigaohm.bio/w/3442q71n6uzwMckdXtxa7N
JJ makes a good case for the fraudulent use of the PCR tests. He sounds like he knows what he is talking about. Thank you for the link Gunther.
You´re welcome. I call him Crazy JJ not because he´s wrong about the truth, but because he´s probably right.
I think you gave me the link in the past. I will look again, thanks!
Ah yes, the past. It´s sure flying by!
What's the difference anyway? Either way, I get NOTHING.
This place sucks.
Oh, ... and if it is you, Substack ... that is manipulating who gets to see my work, trying to demoralize me, showing me little evidence of interest ... then GO LOVE YOURSELF!
I will keep going.
Yes….keep going!
Thank you!