The scheme seems to reveal its hand in this quote regarding the troubled pension fund (PERA):
“None of this even begins to address the financial calamity that will befall PERA with some medical advancement that extends life expectancy.”
In other words, increased life expectancy is a calamity for pension payouts. Conversely, this implies that reduced life expectancy increases pension solvency thanks to lowered payout expenses.
That pretty much sums up what we’re seeing, and we’re seeing it more every year since the vaccine rollout -- and in most states, not just Colorado.
An unrelated observation: “Bomb mob” is a palindrome, which suggests that as we go forward we’re going backwards ...
I'm in a strange place today. This one took a lot out of me. It blossomed into a much bigger story than I originally thought it would be. The annual report just kept revealing new angles about what had happened. I think the more I do these, the more I see.
Thank you for understanding the importance of that quote. The one about members living longer being bad for solvency. That is the crux of this. There was big incentive to have people not live as long. Cui bono?
I had not realized the palindrome in the name! That is excellent. And so is your observation about the back and forth of it all.
I'm coming to the conclusion that in 2020 the lockdowns and then iatrogenic hospital deaths caused a spike in deaths (April and May) but with some delay from the onset of the plandemic, as it sometimes took people some weeks to expire.
I only know of 2 people who died in hospital of covid, and both died right about then, both of organ failure after about 3 weeks on ventilators. I do not know the details, but looking back on it after having transcribed a very large batch of hospital horrors testimonies, I would wager that had these 2 been treated as pneumonia patients normally would have been treated, they'd have recovered and gone home. Instead hospital covid protocol left them isolated, probably severely neglected, and then the ventilators and paralyzing drugs (needed for patients on ventilators), together with remdesivir, did them in.
Everyone else I know who "died of covid," either it was really "with covid" when they were already dying of dementia or cancer, or, as in 2021-2022 especially, it was, curiously enough, directly after they partook of the "safe and effective."
Over and over again I am struck by how dark and weird all of convid times were, and so really unbelievable— and yet, it was so. Jeffrey Tucker makes this point in his recent Brownstone interview with Sonia Elijah. I can warmly recommend it.
It truly is amazing how long it has taken me to even begin to see what most likely happened. A normal and decent mind, and heart, just does not want to go there. But it must if we are going to deal with this horror. The test of this, like grappling with all things Epstein, is to not be seduced by the darkness of it ... and wallow, helplessly.
The way out is work. One step in front of another. Positive purpose.
Well done in looking for a financial motive for the area specific death rates.
I hope your work is becoming better known and you have the support of other researchers. It suggests that mortality rates via the injections can be adjusted in some way.
The US is a captured state, politically captured and controlled by financial and industry interests. I can see the same thing occurring in the UK, which used to be a social democratic political system.
Thanks currer. I appreciate your comment. No, my fellow researchers, or general viewers of my posts, remain mostly silent in telling me what they think. Obviously I believe what I am uncovering is important, naturally that would be expected - I hope it is justified. I have about 3 or 4 regular readers that give me some feedback. I've been at this for a couple of years now, I had hoped to have more engagement by now. I am left with these options ... either my work just does not resonate with a wide audience or possibly I am being shadow banned by Substack itself. It could also be something else I am unaware of.
I think your work is important. I know it helps to work in a team, and is much more difficult alone. At the moment attention is taken up with the illegal attack on Iran. Maybe once people can give their attention to other things you will find an audience. Do not lose heart. Make sure your work is well researched, accurate, and as good as you can make it. I am sure at some point people will realise you have put your finger on some important inducements for the deaths, and can prove it by looking at the investment returns for these pension funds. Well done. 👍❤
The scheme seems to reveal its hand in this quote regarding the troubled pension fund (PERA):
“None of this even begins to address the financial calamity that will befall PERA with some medical advancement that extends life expectancy.”
In other words, increased life expectancy is a calamity for pension payouts. Conversely, this implies that reduced life expectancy increases pension solvency thanks to lowered payout expenses.
That pretty much sums up what we’re seeing, and we’re seeing it more every year since the vaccine rollout -- and in most states, not just Colorado.
An unrelated observation: “Bomb mob” is a palindrome, which suggests that as we go forward we’re going backwards ...
Thank you David.
That is a much appreciated comment.
I'm in a strange place today. This one took a lot out of me. It blossomed into a much bigger story than I originally thought it would be. The annual report just kept revealing new angles about what had happened. I think the more I do these, the more I see.
Thank you for understanding the importance of that quote. The one about members living longer being bad for solvency. That is the crux of this. There was big incentive to have people not live as long. Cui bono?
I had not realized the palindrome in the name! That is excellent. And so is your observation about the back and forth of it all.
Thank you again.
Glad to see another post in this line.
I'm coming to the conclusion that in 2020 the lockdowns and then iatrogenic hospital deaths caused a spike in deaths (April and May) but with some delay from the onset of the plandemic, as it sometimes took people some weeks to expire.
I only know of 2 people who died in hospital of covid, and both died right about then, both of organ failure after about 3 weeks on ventilators. I do not know the details, but looking back on it after having transcribed a very large batch of hospital horrors testimonies, I would wager that had these 2 been treated as pneumonia patients normally would have been treated, they'd have recovered and gone home. Instead hospital covid protocol left them isolated, probably severely neglected, and then the ventilators and paralyzing drugs (needed for patients on ventilators), together with remdesivir, did them in.
Everyone else I know who "died of covid," either it was really "with covid" when they were already dying of dementia or cancer, or, as in 2021-2022 especially, it was, curiously enough, directly after they partook of the "safe and effective."
Over and over again I am struck by how dark and weird all of convid times were, and so really unbelievable— and yet, it was so. Jeffrey Tucker makes this point in his recent Brownstone interview with Sonia Elijah. I can warmly recommend it.
Thank you Transcriber B.
It truly is amazing how long it has taken me to even begin to see what most likely happened. A normal and decent mind, and heart, just does not want to go there. But it must if we are going to deal with this horror. The test of this, like grappling with all things Epstein, is to not be seduced by the darkness of it ... and wallow, helplessly.
The way out is work. One step in front of another. Positive purpose.
That is your example. I appreciate it.
Well done in looking for a financial motive for the area specific death rates.
I hope your work is becoming better known and you have the support of other researchers. It suggests that mortality rates via the injections can be adjusted in some way.
The US is a captured state, politically captured and controlled by financial and industry interests. I can see the same thing occurring in the UK, which used to be a social democratic political system.
Thanks currer. I appreciate your comment. No, my fellow researchers, or general viewers of my posts, remain mostly silent in telling me what they think. Obviously I believe what I am uncovering is important, naturally that would be expected - I hope it is justified. I have about 3 or 4 regular readers that give me some feedback. I've been at this for a couple of years now, I had hoped to have more engagement by now. I am left with these options ... either my work just does not resonate with a wide audience or possibly I am being shadow banned by Substack itself. It could also be something else I am unaware of.
Anyway, thanks for talking to me.
I think your work is important. I know it helps to work in a team, and is much more difficult alone. At the moment attention is taken up with the illegal attack on Iran. Maybe once people can give their attention to other things you will find an audience. Do not lose heart. Make sure your work is well researched, accurate, and as good as you can make it. I am sure at some point people will realise you have put your finger on some important inducements for the deaths, and can prove it by looking at the investment returns for these pension funds. Well done. 👍❤
Thanks currer.